Challenges in implementing policies

Let’s explore some of these barriers:

Resource Constraint:

  • Limited financial and human resources can hinder the implementation of comprehensive alcohol policies.
  • Allocating sufficient resources for enforcement, monitoring, and evaluation is essential.

Legal Loopholes:

  • Existing legal frameworks may have gaps or loopholes that allow for non-compliance or exploitation.
  • Addressing these loopholes requires legal amendments and rigorous enforcement.

Lack of Evidence:

  • Policymakers often lack local evidence to support policy implementation.
  • Rigorous research and data collection are necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of specific measures.

Low Priority:

  • Alcohol control policies may not be a top priority for responsible agencies.
  • Competing priorities can lead to delays or inadequate attention to policy implementation.

Insufficient Skills of Implementers:

  • Effective policy implementation requires skilled personnel.
  • Lack of training or expertise among implementers can hinder successful execution.

Industry Influence:

  • The alcohol industry may resist policy changes that affect their profits.
  • Industry lobbying and influence can delay or weaken policy implementation.

Public Perception and Acceptance:

  • Policies that restrict alcohol availability or increase prices may face opposition from the public.
  • Building public awareness and acceptance is crucial.

Political Commitment:

  • Strong political will and commitment are necessary for sustained policy implementation.
  • Changes in government or shifting priorities can impact policy continuity.

Cross-Border Challenges:

  • Alcohol policies often intersect with international trade and cross-border issues.
  • Harmonizing policies across countries can be complex.

Cultural and Social Factors:

  • Cultural norms, traditions, and social acceptance of alcohol play a role.
  • Policies must consider local contexts and community attitudes.

Addressing these challenges requires collaboration among stakeholders, evidence-based approaches, and sustained commitment to public health & safety.

Successful case studies of effective alcohol policies in different countries:


  • In the early 2000s, Lithuania had one of the highest per capita alcohol consumption levels.
  • The country implemented a competitive policy using the WHO best buys to correct this trend over a short period.
  • Measures included restrictions on alcohol advertising and a ban on alcohol sales in petrol stations and kiosks.
  • The second package introduced in 2016 further increased the minimum legal drinking age, raised alcohol prices, limited retail sale time, and banned alcohol advertisements.
  • These comprehensive measures led to a significant reduction in alcohol consumption.


  • Scotland implemented a minimum unit pricing (MUP) policy in 2018.
  • The policy set a minimum price per unit of alcohol to reduce excessive drinking.
  • Early evidence suggests a decline in alcohol-related hospital admissions and deaths in Scotland.

Russian Federation:

  • The Russian Federation introduced several alcohol control measures.
  • These included increased excise taxes, restrictions on advertising, and availability limitations.
  • The impact of these measures was assessed, showing positive effects on mortality and life expectancy.

Other Countries:

France: Introduced a graduated tax system based on alcohol content, leading to reduced alcohol consumption.

Finland: Implemented a comprehensive alcohol policy that included pricing, availability, and advertising restrictions.

Australia: Introduced plain packaging for alcoholic beverages to reduce brand appeal.

In summary, these case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of evidence-based alcohol policies in reducing harm and improving public health outcomes.

Read about Delhi CM arrest here.